바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

주거 유동성, 독립성의 가치 및 독특성 선호 간의 관계

The Relation among Residential Mobility, Values of Independence, and Preference for Uniqueness

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2013, v.19 no.2, pp.179-202
박혜경 (성신여자대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

전 지구적으로 주거 이동이 활발해짐에 따라 주거 유동성의 심리사회적 영향에 대한 관심이 증가하고 있다. 그러나 국내에서는 아직까지 이에 관한 연구가 본격적으로 이루어지지 않았다. 이에 주목하여 본 연구에서는 개인의 거주지 이전 경험과 심리적 독립성의 관계를 조명하고자 하였다. 구체적으로, 이 연구에서는 개인의 주거 이동 경험에 따라 가치의 실제 자기 중요도 대 지각된 사회적 중요도(연구 1)와 독특성에 대한 선호도(연구 2)가 어떻게 달라지는지 검증하였다. 그 결과, 주거 이동을 빈번하게 경험하였던 사람들일수록 자신이 타인에 비하여 개인주의적인 가치들은 더 중요하게, 집단주의적인 가치들은 덜 중요하게 여긴다고 지각하며, 독특성을 더욱 강하게 선호한다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 마지막으로, 본 연구의 결과가 주거 유동성과 심리적 독립성의 관계에서 영향의 방향에 관하여 가지는 함의를 논하고 후속 연구 방향을 제안하였다.

keywords
주거 유동성, 가치, 실제 자기 중요도, 지각된 사회적 중요도, 독특성 선호, residential mobility, values, actual self-importance, perceived social importance, preference for uniqueness

Abstract

This research examined the relation between personal history of residential moves and psychological independence. In particular, this research tested how actual self-importance (vis-a-vis perceived social importance) of values (Study 1) and preference for uniqueness (Study 2) would vary as a function of past experience of moving. The results showed that personal history of residential moves was positively linked to actual self-importance of individualistic values and perceived social importance of collectivistic values. In addition, the results demonstrated that individuals with frequent residential moves generally showed a greater liking for uniqueness. The implications of these results for the direction of causation between residential mobility and psychological independence are discussed and suggestions for future research are made.

keywords
주거 유동성, 가치, 실제 자기 중요도, 지각된 사회적 중요도, 독특성 선호, residential mobility, values, actual self-importance, perceived social importance, preference for uniqueness

참고문헌

1.

통계청 (n.d.). 국내인구이동통계. Retrieved April 8, 2013, from http://www.index.go.kr/egams/ stts/jsp/potal/stts/PO_STTS_IdxSearch.jsp?idx_cd=1013&stts_cd=101301&clas_div=&idx_sys_cd=&idx_clas_cd=1

2.

Cohen, D. (2001). Cultural variation: Considerations and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 451-471.

3.

Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi- experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

4.

Edgerton, R. B. (1965). “Cultural” vs. “ecological” factors in the expression of values, attitudes, and personality characteristics. American Anthropologist, 67, 442-447.

5.

Edgerton, R. B. (1971). The individual in cultural adaptation: A study of four East African peoples. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

6.

Fischer, R. (2004). Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: A classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35, 263-282.

7.

Fischer, R. (2006). Congruence and functions of personal and cultural values: Do my values reflect my culture's values? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1419-1431.

8.

Goldschmidt, W. (1971). Independence as an element in pastoral social systems. Anthropological Quarterly, 44, 132-142.

9.

Hamamura, T. (2012). Are cultures becoming individualistic? A cross-temporal comparison of individualism-collectivism in the United States and Japan. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 3-24.

10.

Heine, S. J., & Hamamura, T. (2007). In search of East Asian self-enhancement. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 4-27.

11.

Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1999). Is there a universal need for positive self-regard? Psychological Review, 106, 766-794.

12.

Hirai, M. (1999). Stereotypes about the Japanese: Differences in evaluations between “the Japanese” and “myself.” Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 103-113.

13.

Jokela, M. (2009). Personality predicts migration within and between U.S. states. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 79-83.

14.

Kim, H., & Markus, H. R. (1999). Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 785-800.

15.

Kim, H. S., & Sherman, D. K. (2008). What do we see in a tilted square? A validation of the Figure Independence Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 47-60.

16.

Kitayama, S., Bowman, N. A. (2009). Cultural consequences of voluntary settlement in the frontier: Evidence and implications. In M. Schaller, A. Norenzayan, S. J. Heine, T. Yamagishi, & T. Kameda (Eds.), Evolution, culture, and the human mind (pp.205-227). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

17.

Kitayama, S., Conway, L. G., Pietromonaco, P. R., Park, H., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Ethos of independence across regions in the United States: The production-adoption model of cultural change. American Psychologist, 65, 559- 574.

18.

Kitayama, S., Ishii, K., Imada, T., Takemura, K., & Ramaswamy, J. (2006). Voluntary settlement and the spirit of independence: Evidence from Japan’s “northern frontier.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 369-384.

19.

Kitayama, S., Park, H., Sevincer, A. T., Karasawa, M., & Uskul, A. K. (2009). A cultural task analysis of implicit independence: Comparing North America, Western Europe, and East Asia. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 236-255.

20.

Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 992-1004.

21.

Lun, J., Oishi, S., & Tenney, E. R. (2012). Residential mobility moderates preferences for egalitarian versus loyal helpers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 291-297.

22.

Miller, D. T., & Prentice, D. A. (1994). Collective errors and errors about the collective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 541-550.

23.

Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the South. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

24.

Oishi, S. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships, and well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 5-21.

25.

Oishi, S., Ishii, K., & Lun, J. (2009). Residential mobility and conditionality of group identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 913-919.

26.

Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., Miao, F. F., Talhelm, T., Endo, Y., Uchida, Y., et al. (2013). Residential mobility increases motivation to expand social network: But why? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 217-223.

27.

Oishi, S., Krochik, M., Roth, D., & Sherman, G. D. (2012). Residential mobility, personality, and subjective and physical well-being: An analysis of cortisol secretion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 153-161.

28.

Oishi, S., Lun, J., & Sherman, G. D. (2007). Residential mobility, self-concept, and positive affect in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 131-141.

29.

Oishi, S., Miao, F. F., Koo, M., Kisling, J., & Ratliff, K. A. (2012). Residential mobility breeds familiarity-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 149-162.

30.

Oishi, S., Rothman, A. J., Snyder, M., Su, J., Zehm, K., Hertel, A. W., et al. (2007). The socioecological model of procommunity action: The benefits of residential stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 831-844.

31.

Oishi, S., & Schimmack, U. (2010). Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 980-994.

32.

Oishi, S., Schimmack, U., Diener, E., & Suh, E. M. (1998). The measurement of values and individualism-collectivism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1177-1189.

33.

Oishi, S., & Talhelm, T. (2012). Residential mobility: What psychological research reveals. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 425-430.

34.

Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243-256.

35.

Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255-277.

36.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp.1-65). New York, NY: Academic Press.

37.

Sevincer, A. T., Park, H., & Kitayama, S. (2009). [Settlement and implicit independence: Comparing in-state and out-of-state students in a German university]. Unpublished data, University of Hamburg.

38.

Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 814-830.

39.

Terracciano, A., Abdel-Khalek, A. M., Adam, N., Adamovova, L., Ahn, C.-k., Ahn, H.-n., et al. (2005). National character does not reflect mean personality trait levels in 49 cultures. Science, 310, 96-100.

40.

Triandis, H. C. (1994). Culture and social behavior. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

41.

Triandis, H. C. (1996). The psychological measurement of cultural syndrome. American Psychologist, 51, 407-415.

42.

Twenge, J. M., Abebe, E. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). Fitting in or standing out: Trends in American parents’ choices for children’s names, 1880-2007. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 19-25.

43.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2009). Trends in international migrant stock: The 2008 revision (United Nations database, POP/DB/ MIG/Stock/Rev.2008).

44.

Varnum, M. E. W., & Kitayama, S. (2011). What’s in a name? Popular names are less common on frontiers. Psychological Science, 22, 176-183.

45.

Wan, C., Chiu, C.-Y., Peng, S., & Tam, K.-P. (2007). Measuring cultures through intersubjective cultural norms: Implications for predicting relative identification with two or more cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38, 213-226.

46.

Wan, C., Chiu, C.-Y., Tam, K.-P., Lee, S.-L., Lau, I. Y.-M., & Peng, S. (2007). Perceived cultural importance and actual self-importance of values in cultural identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 337-354.

47.

Yamagishi, T., Hashimoto, H., Li, Y., & Schug, J. (2012). Stadtluft macht frei (City air brings freedom). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 38-45.

48.

Zou, X., Tam, K.-P., Morris, M. W., Lee, S.-L., Lau, I. Y.-M., & Chiu, C.-Y. (2009). Culture as common sense: Perceived consensus versus personal beliefs as mechanisms of cultural influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 579-597.

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제