바로가기메뉴

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

logo

한국판 지속 유대 척도의 타당화

Validation of the Korean Version of the Continuing Bonds Scale

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661
2016, v.22 no.2, pp.263-283
김계양 (아주대학교)
박종원 (아주대학교)
김완석 (아주대학교)
  • 다운로드 수
  • 조회수

초록

본 연구는 지속 유대 척도(Continuing Bonds Scale: CBS)를 한국어로 번안하여 한국판 지속 유대 척도(이하 K-CBS)의 요인구조, 신뢰도 및 타당도를 평가하기 위하여 수행되었다. 연구 1에서 가족을 포함하여 친밀관계에 있던 사람과 사별한 경험이 있는 성인을 대상(293명)으로 탐색적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 10개 문항의 단일 요인 구조가 도출되었으며, 전체 변량의 52.59%를 설명하였다. K-CBS의 내적 합치도는 .92로 양호하였다. 연구 2에서 동일한 조건의 새로운 표본(200명)을 대상으로 확인적 요인분석을 실시한 결과, 표준화 회귀계수 추정치는 모두 적절하였지만 다중상관자승치가 .40 미만인 한 문항이 있어서 이것을 제거하고 9문항을 최종 문항으로 결정하였다. 9문항 단일 요인에 대한 모형 적합도는 양호한 수준으로 나타났다. 관련 변인과의 관계를 보면, K-CBS는 애도반응과 정적 상관을 보이고, 우울과도 약한 정적 상관을 보였으나 애도반응을 통제했을 때, K-CBS는 오히려 우울감소를 예측하였다. 외상 후 성장과는 유의한 정적 상관을 나타냈다. 아울러 K-CBS 점수는 사별 대상과 상실 예상 여부에 따른 집단에서 차이가 유의하게 나타났다. 이러한 결과는 K-CBS가 지속 유대를 신뢰롭고 타당하게 측정하는 도구임을 보여준다. 끝으로 본 연구의 의의와 제한점, 추후 연구방향에 대해 논의하였다.

keywords
지속 유대, 사별, 애도, 신뢰도, 타당도, continuing bonds, bereavement, grief, reliability, validity

Abstract

The present study aimed at examining the factor structure, reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Continuing Bonds Scale (K-CBS). In study 1, exploratory factor analysis was administered to 293 bereaved adults who had experienced the death of a loved one, and it revealed a single factor structure with 10 items that explained 52.59% of the total variance. The K-CBS showed good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha of .92. In study 2, confirmatory factor analysis in a different sample of 200 bereaved adults indicated satisfactory standardized regression weights of all items. However, one item had a squared multiple correlation less than .40, hence, this item was discarded, and 9 items remained for the final scale. The single factor model with 9 items displayed a good fit. The K-CBS had strong positive correlation with grief symptoms, and weak positive correlation with depression. After controlling for grief, however, the K-CBS was predictive of a decrease in depression. The K-CBS was positively associated with posttraumatic growth. In addition, significant differences in scores of the K-CBS were shown among groups based on the deceased's relation to the bereaved and expectedness of loss. These results suggest that the K-CBS is a reliable and valid instrument to measure continuing bonds. Finally, implications, limitations, and directions for future research were discussed.

keywords
지속 유대, 사별, 애도, 신뢰도, 타당도, continuing bonds, bereavement, grief, reliability, validity

참고문헌

1.

송승훈, 이홍석, 박준호, 김교헌 (2009). 한국판 외상후 성장 척도의 타당도 및 신뢰도 연구. 한국심리학회지: 건강, 14(1), 193-214.

2.

안영란 (2006). 배우자 사별 여성을 위한 개별적 사별 중재 프로그램의 개발과 효과. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위 논문.

3.

전겸구, 이민규 (1992). 한국판 CES-D 개발 연구 1. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 11(1), 65-76.

4.

홍세희 (2000). 구조방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거. 한국심리학회지: 임상, 19(1), 161-177.

5.

Baltes, M. M., & Carstensen, L. L. (1996). The process of successful ageing. Ageing and Society, 16(4), 397-422.

6.

Boelen, P., Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Zijerveld, A. (2006). Continuing bonds and grief: A prospective analysis. Death Studies, 30, 767-776.

7.

Boerner, K., & Heckhausen, J. (2003). To have and have not: Adaptive bereavement by transforming mental ties to the deceased. Death Studies, 27, 199-226.

8.

Bonanno, G. A., & Kaltman, S. (1999). Toward an integrative perspective on bereavement. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 760-776.

9.

Bonanno, G. A., Notarius, C. I., Gunzerath, L., Keltner, D., & Horowitz, M. J. (1998). Interpersonal ambivalence, perceived relationship adjustment, and conjugal loss. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(6), 1012-1022.

10.

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss, Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. New York: Basic Books.

11.

Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2001). Posttraumatic growth: The positive lessons of loss. In R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss (pp. 157-172). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

12.

Currier, J. M., Irish, J. E. F., Neimeyer, R. A., & Foster, J. D. (2015). Attachment, continuing bonds, and complicated grief following violent loss: Testing a moderated model. Death Studies, 39, 201-210.

13.

Field, N. P. (2008). Whether to relinquish or maintain a bond with the deceased. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (pp. 113-132). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

14.

Field, N. P., & Filanosky, C. (2010). Continuing bonds, risk factors for complicated grief, and adjustment to bereavement. Death Studies, 34, 1-29.

15.

Field, N. P., & Friedrichs, M. (2004). Continuing bonds in coping with the death of a husband. Death Studies, 28, 597-620.

16.

Field, N. P., Gal-Oz, E., & Bonanno, G. A. (2003). Continuing bonds and adjustment at 5 years after the death of a spouse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(1), 110- 117.

17.

Field, N. P., Gao, B., & Paderna, P. A. (2005). Continuing Bonds in Bereavement: An attachment theory based perspective. Death Studies, 29, 277-299.

18.

Field, N. P., Nichols, C., Holen, A., & Horowitz, M. J. (1999). The relation of continuing attachment to adjustment in conjugal bereavement. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(2), 212-218.

19.

Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Loss and Bereavement: Attachment theory and recent controversies concerning “grief work” and the nature of detachment. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 735-759). New York: Guilford.

20.

Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and Melancholia. In J. Strachey (Ed., & Trans), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 14(1914-1916). On the history of the psychoanalytic movement, papers on metapsychology and other works (pp. 237-258). London: The Hogarth Press.

21.

Gaines, R. (1997). Detachment and continuity. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 33(4), 549-571.

22.

Hagman, G. (1995). Death of a selfobject: Toward a self psychology of the mourning process. In A. Goldberg(Ed.), Progress in self psychology, Vol. 11. The impact of new ideas. (pp. 189-205). Hillsdale NJ: Analytic Press.

23.

Hagman, G. (2001). Beyond decathexis: Toward a new psychoanalytic understanding and treatment of mourning. In R. A. Neimeyer (Ed.), Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss (pp. 13-31). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

24.

Horowitz, M. J., Siegel, B., Holen, A., Bonanno, G. A., Milbrath, C., & Stinson, C. H. (1997). Diagnostic criteria for complicated grief disorder. American Journal of psychiatry, 154(7), 904-910.

25.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

26.

Kim, K., & Jacobs, S. (1991). Pathological grief and its relationship to other psychiatric disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 21(4), 257-263.

27.

Klass, D., Silverman, P. R., & Nickman, S. L. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understandings of grief. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.

28.

Klass, D., & Walter, T. (2001). Processes of grieving: How bonds are continued. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 431-448). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

29.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

30.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). An attachment perspective on bereavement. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (pp. 87-112). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

31.

Neimeyer, R. A., Baldwin, S. A., & Gillies, J. (2006). Continuing bonds and reconstructing meaning: Mitigating complications in bereavement. Death Studies, 30, 715-738.

32.

Neimeyer, R. A., & Hogan, N. (2001). Quantitative or qualitative? Measurement issues in the study of grief. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 89-118). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

33.

Parkes, C. M. (1993). Bereavement as a psycho- social transition: Processes of adaptation to change. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 91-101). New York: Cambridge University Press.

34.

Parkes, C. M. (1998). Recovery from bereavement (3rd ed.). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

35.

Parkes, C. M., & Prigerson, H. G. (2010). Bereavement: Studies of grief in adult life (4th ed.). London: Penguin.

36.

Raphael, B. (1983). The anatomy of bereavement. New York: Basic Books.

37.

Rando, T. A. (1993). Treatment of complicated grief. Champaign, IL: Research Press.

38.

Root, B. L., & Exline, J. J. (2014). The role of continuing bonds in coping with grief: Overview and future directions. Death Studies, 38, 1-8.

39.

Rosenblatt, P. C. (2001). A social constructionist perspective on cultural differences in grief. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 285-300). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

40.

Sanders, C. M. (1989). Grief: The mourning after. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

41.

Schut, H. A. W., Stroebe, M., S., Boelen, P. A., & Zijerveld, A. M. (2006). Continuing relationships with the deceased: Disentangling bonds and grief. Death Studies, 30, 757-766.

42.

Shuchter, S. R., & Zisook, S. (1993). The course of normal grief. In M. S. Stroebe, W. Stroebe, & R. O. Hansson (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 23-43). New York: Cambridge University Press.

43.

Silverman, P. R., Nickman, S., & Worden, J. W. (1992). Detachment revisited: The child's reconstruction of a dead parent. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62(4), 494-503.

44.

Stroebe, M. S., Abakoumkin, G., Stroebe, W., & Schut, H. (2012). Continuing bonds in adjustment to bereavement: Impact of abrupt versus gradual separation. Personal Relationships, 19(2), 255-266.

45.

Stroebe, M. S., & Schut, H. (2005). To continue or relinquish bonds: A review of consequences for the bereaved. Death Studies, 29, 477-494.

46.

Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Boerner, K. (2010). Continuing bonds in adaptation to bereavement: Toward theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 259-268.

47.

Volkan, V. D. (1981). Linking objects and linking phenomena. New York: International Universities Press.

48.

Wortman, C. B., & Silver, R. C. (2001). The myths of coping with loss revisited. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping, and care (pp. 405-429). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

49.

Worden, J. W. (1982). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner. New York: Springer.

50.

Worden, J. W. (2003). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner (3rd ed.). Hove, New York: Brunner-Routledge.

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제