Characteristics of Aggressive Victims of Dating Violence and their Commitments in Dating Relationships

서경현; 안귀여루

권한신청
P-ISSN1229-0661
E-ISSN1229-0661
KCI

홈으로

OA 정책

논문 상세

이전 다음

논문 투고

Vol.13 No.2

Citation Share

데이트 폭력의 공격적 피해여성들의 특성과 연인관계에 대한 개입

Characteristics of Aggressive Victims of Dating Violence and their Commitments in Dating Relationships

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제 / Korean Psychological Journal of Culture and Social Issues, (P)1229-0661; (E)1229-0661

2007, v.13 no.2, pp.77-96

서경현 (삼육대학교)
안귀여루 (강남대학교)

서경현, & 안귀여루. (2007). 데이트 폭력의 공격적 피해여성들의 특성과 연인관계에 대한 개입. 한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제, 13(2), 77-96.

복사

다운로드 수
조회수

PDF 다운로드

초록

본 연구의 목적은 데이트 폭력 피해여성, 특히 공격적 피해여성들의 특성을 파악하고 그들이 연인관계를 형성하고 그것에 개입하는 방식을 탐색하는 것이다. 연구의 참여자는 데이트 경험이 있는 526명의 여대생들이었고, 그들의 연령 분포는 18세에서 37세(M=20.10, SD=2.70) 사이였다. 본 연구에서 사용된 심리검사는 Straus의 갈등책략척도, Foo와 Margolin의 데이트 폭력 정당화 척도, 정진경의 한국판 성역할 검사, 이경성과 한덕웅의 상호이해, 관계만족 및 관계개입 척도이다. 분석 결과, 순수 피해자보다 공격적 피해자가 심하게 구타당하는 경우도 많지만 약한 정도의 신체적 가해를 당하는 비율도 상당히 높았다. 반면에 공격적 피해자보다 순수 피해자가 성폭력을 당하는 비율이 높았다. 공격적 피해자가 데이트 폭력 미경험자보다 아버지의 가정폭력을 목격한 경험이 많았다. 데이트 폭력 피해 여성이 데이트 폭력 미경험 여성보다 데이트 폭력에 관해 관대한 태도를 보였다. 그리고 데이트 폭력의 피해여성이 미경험 여성보다 관계에 더 개입되어 있었다. 본 연구의 결과는 데이트 폭력 피해를 예방하고 피해자의 추후 위험 요인을 제거하는데 도움을 줄 것이다.

keywords: 데이트 폭력, 공격적 피해자, 가정폭력, 성역할, 관계개입, dating violence, aggressive victims, domestic violence, gender-role, commitment in dating relationship

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate characteristics of victims, especially aggressive victims of dating violence, and examine how they constructed the dating relationship and their commitments in dating relationships. The participants were 526 female college students who had the experience of heterosexual dating relationships, whose ages ranged from 18 to 37 (M=20.10, SD=2.70). The psychological tests used in this research included the following: Straus' Conflict Tactics Scale, Foo and Margolin's Justification of Violence Scale, Korean Version of Gender-Role Scale, and Lee and Han's Relationship Measures. Results revealed that aggressive victims of dating violence were more likely to receive mild violence as well as severe violence from their dating partners than victims only, while women who were victim only experienced sexual harassments more than aggressive victims from their dating partners. Aggressive victims of dating violence had experienced fathers' domestic violence more than women who had not experienced dating violence. Victims of dating violence showed less negative attitude toward dating violence than women who had not experienced dating violence. Victims of dating violence showed stronger commitments in their dating relationships than women who had not experienced dating violence. The results of this study may provide valuable information for professionals who help victims of dating violence.

keywords: 데이트 폭력, 공격적 피해자, 가정폭력, 성역할, 관계개입, dating violence, aggressive victims, domestic violence, gender-role, commitment in dating relationship

참고문헌

김정란, (1999) 대학생의 이성교제 중 폭력과 대처 행동,

김양희, (2000) 한국형 남녀평등의식검사 개발,

(2002) 공격적 피해자의 정신 건강 및 학교 적응에 관한 연구,

서경현, (2001) 이성을 사귀면서도 폭력을 행사하는가?,

서경현, (2002) 청소년들의 데이트 폭력 가해 행동에 대한 사회학습적 변인들과 분노의 역할, 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제

(2003) 음주 동기, 문제음주 및 음주 가족력과 대학생의 데이트 폭력,

서경현, (2004) 고등학생과 대학생의 데이트 폭력과 가정폭력의 관계에서의 성의 조절효과,

서경현, (2001) 대학생들의 데이트 폭력과 예측변인,

서경현, (2002) 여성들의 분노, 정신병적 경향성 및 중독성이 데이트 폭력 피해에 미치는 영향,

10.

(2001) 고등학생들의 데이트 폭력의 예측변인,

11.

안귀여루, (2001) 성장기에 부모의 배우자 폭력에 노출된 경험과 초기 성인기의 적응,

12.

(2004) 친밀한 이성관계에서 성격이 관계만족 및 개입에 미치는 영향,

13.

이경성 ; 한덕웅, (2003) 결혼적응검사의 개발, 한국심리학회지: 건강

14.

정진경, (2004) 한국 성역할 검사(KSRI),

15.

(1989) Evaluations of physical aggression among intimate dyads Journal of Interpersonal Violence,

16.

Frieze, (1992) Predictors of dating violence,

17.

(2000) Relationship Dependency, Dating Violence, and Scripts of Female College Students,

18.

Comins, (1984) A recent study and its implications for future research Paper delivered at the Second National Conference for Family Violence Researchers,

19.

Craig, W. M, (2001) Developmental context of peer harassment in early adolescence: The role of puberty and the peer group, New York: Guilford Press

20.

(2004) Predicting future injury among women in abusive relationships,

21.

(1981) The development of emotional attachments in battered women and other relationships of intermittent abuse, Dutton

22.

Federal Bureau of Investigation, (2000) Crime in the United States, 1999, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice

23.

Felix, E. D, (2006) Gender and Multiple Forms of Peer Victimization: How Do They Influence Adolescent Psychosocial Adjustment?,

24.

Foo, L, (1995) A multivariate investigation of dating violence,

25.

(2001) Gender differences in the longitudinal predictors of adolescent dating violence,

26.

Gray, H. M, (1997) Adolescent Dating Violence: Differences between one- sided and mutually violent profiles,

27.

Heise, L, (2002) Violence by intimate partners, Geneva: World Health Organization

28.

(1983) Romance and violence in dating relationships Journal of Family Issues,

29.

Higgins, (1989) What patterns of self-beliefs cause people to suffer? In Berkowitz Advances in experimental social psychology, Academic Press

30.

(2003) Risk profiles of adolescent girls who were victims of dating violence,

31.

Kelly, (1987) A propective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

32.

(1990) An emerging issue for the 1990s,

33.

Lichte, E. L, (2004) The effects of childhood exposure to marital violence on adolescent gender-role beliefs and dating violence,

34.

(1998) Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence,

35.

Neufeld, J, (1999) Incidence and prevalence of dating partner abuse and its relationship to dating practices,

36.

(1991) A course for teenage women in love Young women in danger, The Seal Press

37.

(1985) Women who love too much,

38.

O'Keefe, M, (1997) Predictors of dating violence among high school student,

39.

(1998) Factors mediating the link between witnessing interparental violence and dating violence,

40.

(1991) Their views on symptoms and recovery,

41.

(2006) Dating Violence Victimization: Associated Drinking and Sexual Risk Behaviors of Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Caucasian High School Students in Hawaii,

42.

(1989) Intentional falsification in reports of interpartner aggression Journal of Interpersonal Violence,

43.

(1996) Aggression between heterosexual dating partners: An examination of a causal model of courtship aggression,

44.

(1980) Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations A test of the investment model Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,

45.

(1983) A longitudinal test of the investment model of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

46.

(2000) Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children's peer groups,

47.

(1993) The emergence of chronic peer victimization in boys' play groups,

48.

(1984) Violence in college students' dating relationships Journal of Applied Social Psychology,

49.

(1987) Violence in dating relationship,

50.

(1979) Journal of Marriage and the Family,

51.

(1959) The Social Psychology of Groups,

52.

(2000) Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, Washington(DC) Department of Justice

53.

(2006) Blame for intimate partner violence: An attributional analysis,

바로가기메뉴

논문 상세

Vol.13 No.2

데이트 폭력의 공격적 피해여성들의 특성과 연인관계에 대한 개입

Characteristics of Aggressive Victims of Dating Violence and their Commitments in Dating Relationships

초록

Abstract

참고문헌

한국심리학회지 : 문화 및 사회문제